12/11/2023 0 Comments Seimac profind manual![]() If it were DoD, CAP, or grant monies and ISSUED to a unit then it is on my RADAR in our wing to get moved to a unit with active ES resources. ![]() It is unlikely that the WING would ask a locally funded piece of equipment to be MOVED to another unit. Some units that DO purchase their own and have these units could be the units like were mentioned that could be on the downside of their "recruiting cycle". We're not quite impressed with them either which agrees with the anecdotal information that everyone else has expressed. ![]() I think that their intent was for field research honestly. Those were the first DF equipment pieces that were purchased in over a decade in common knowledge (and CEMS) to Ky knowledge. OPERATIONS at NHQ purchased the SEIMAC units on a limited number for each Wing in 2006. If you have a DOA one sitting on the shelf, you should probably have it fixed, if only from the "good steward of CAP resources standpoint", and having another set of directional eyes in a search isn't a bad thing, however, given the choice I'll probably still reach for the trusty Kennedy-Era L-Per first. So it "works", I guess, but considering it was over $1200 when purchased, I was expecting it to do "more" - at least in as much as being more definite in its indications.Īs I said, this is basically a radio scanner with some directional arrows. It reached a certain level of signal strength, and then from there topped out no matter how close we were to the ELT. The Pro-Find got us to the same place as the L-Per's, but not with what I would quantify as "confidence". That night we had two standard L-Pers, the Pro-Find, and my vehicle mounted scanner. It still has a predilection to indicate right, even when there is no signal to find, and it has a weird growl when you're right on top of the beacon, different from what you would expect from an L-Per. too many quick presses of the volume controls). Inside of 60ft its basically a radio scanner, and occasionally would reboot for no reason (i.e. The short antennas limit its reception range to the mid-point of the search, and having no receive mode doesn't make it a more effective device, either. ![]() Both minor customer service issues that I can fix for $1 at the hardware store.Įverything powered up ok, I took it all outside and tested it.Īssuming it is now working to factory spec, its simply not that great a device. Further, the beacon itself had not been reassembled correctly as at least one of the o-ring seals was pinched sideways instead of being seated around the screw. Also, upon arrival I found that it had not been repacked in the foam correctly and one of the plastic screws on the practice beacon had been bumping against the recharger and broke off. They shipped it in just the Pelican case without a box or lock, which did not make me too happy, but whatever. I checked with Wing, gave them my Credit Card and waited for it to come back. ![]() I pointed out that this had been a DOA failure and we should not have to pay for their labor, but since we had sat on this for two years (their records indicate it was delivered in 2006!), it was reasonable to pay for the parts and shipping ($40). At first, Corbham wanted me to pay for the part, labor, and return shipping to the tune of about $120. The issue was a $5 switch that needed to be replaced. While its now repaired and appears fully functional, I'm still disappointed, if only because my expectations were so high. After all the above (and more external from CT), I finally got it back last week - it showed up on Tuesday at 1030, and I had an actual I could use it on that night, so pretty good from a testing perspective. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |